Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:06:14 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@FreeBSD.org> To: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>, x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes Message-ID: <20110324200614.GW85668@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimuxnfb6ys%2Bx9GFRrQvNOdje6TTP-L7jgDkWBqZ@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimuxnfb6ys%2Bx9GFRrQvNOdje6TTP-L7jgDkWBqZ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 19.03.2011 at 09:49:39 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: > Hey, > > as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to > do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second > largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories > spinned out. On the other side, x11-servers category, with only > 10 ports, will be folded into regular x11 category. Why? I can understand you'd like to move the handful of x11-servers into x11, but what do you gain by splitting www? The time and repo-churn could probably be spent on something more constructive than moving ports around. Uli -- "Hierarchies don't work!"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110324200614.GW85668>