Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:01:48 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Cc:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Conrad Meyer <cem@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r326758 - in head/sys/i386: conf include
Message-ID:  <5A2ED61C.5060209@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <7A052A1A-EFB4-489D-B8DF-C8080AD59A20@fh-muenster.de>
References:  <201712110432.vBB4WbnE021090@repo.freebsd.org> <20171211091943.GF2272@kib.kiev.ua> <5A2E5D44.9030904@grosbein.net> <20171211105242.GH2272@kib.kiev.ua> <5A2E6608.5090205@grosbein.net> <20171211150827.GJ2272@kib.kiev.ua> <5A2EB072.6050803@grosbein.net> <7A052A1A-EFB4-489D-B8DF-C8080AD59A20@fh-muenster.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
12.12.2017 1:52, Michael Tuexen wrote:

> Not sure about IPSEC and ZFS. But I was NOT able to reproduce the issue by just using
> an SCTP association on a 32-bit VM using FreeBSD 11.1. So right now I don't know what
> is wrong and therefore what could be fixed...

You just got lucky. Kernel stack abuse by multiple parts of FreeBSD kernel it matter of fact.
But it is not like you always get a panic because sometimes network traffic
is passed through NETISR queues to reduce stack usage and sometimes it is not,
depending on several run-time factors. You may find it stable with one NIC driver
and crashing with another even just because of different stack usage.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A2ED61C.5060209>