Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 May 2005 22:04:19 -0700
From:      Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
To:        Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Scheduler fixes for hyperthreading
Message-ID:  <429012D3.6070803@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <1116738170.867.28.camel@dirk.no.domain>
References:  <428FC00B.3080909@freebsd.org> <aef05e1ae6104223181ad3cf03e11390@xcllnt.net> <428FD710.4060200@freebsd.org> <9e8314b53980a379445cc8c07086901d@xcllnt.net> <428FE788.8020408@freebsd.org> <6451b639f2e0ddacb18f62c571dfeedb@xcllnt.net> <42900C01.10904@freebsd.org> <1116738170.867.28.camel@dirk.no.domain>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sam Lawrance wrote:
> I'm just curious here... would the mac_seeotheruids policy help in
> obscuring the value of any information collected by a spy process?

Yes.  It would mean that the spy could steal an SSL certificate, but
not know whose SSL certificate it was. :-)

Colin Percival



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?429012D3.6070803>