Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 01:31:52 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg> Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22 Message-ID: <085e01c0cc88$4048b820$931576d8@inethouston.net> References: <080e01c0cc84$0e693860$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010424090458.A22159@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <083601c0cc86$07e1dae0$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010424091843.B22159@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At a first glance it might seem too many, but I'd like to atleast keep the 2.0 branch in the tree for a while incase 2.2 has some bugs that 2.0 does not. I found one of them that existed in 2.2 and not 2.0, but luckily they were able to fix it before it was time to release 2.2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:18 AM Subject: Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22 > I think Maxim Sobolev's suggestion about samba20 and samba was most > to the point, although, with the need for a samba-devel port, there get > to be three Samba ports.. I don't necessarily think that's a bad thing. > > G'luck, > Peter > > -- > This sentence every third, but it still comprehensible. > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:15:57AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > That's true, but some people expressed concern for those who wanted to stick > > with 2.0.8 and just have samba20 and samba22 in the ports. Either way is > > fine for me just as long as samba-devel doesn't stay that way forever. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg> > > To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> > > Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:04 AM > > Subject: Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22 > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:01:51AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > > Just a reminder to whomever takes care of this to rename samba-devel to > > > > samba22 since it isn't alpha anymore. > > > > > > I don't really know if samba22 is a good name.. Isn't it supposed to > > > be just 'samba' now that it is the 'official' branch? > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?085e01c0cc88$4048b820$931576d8>