Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 23:50:56 -0700 From: Murray Stokely <murray@osd.bsdi.com> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> Cc: Murray Stokely <murray.stokely@windriver.com>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Markup for ports Message-ID: <20010719235055.A42999@meow.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010720060423.DA9673E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0700 References: <20010719120925.G27537@meow.osd.bsdi.com> <20010720060423.DA9673E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 11:04:23PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > Okay, but this is up to the author of that sentence. <port> is akin > to <filename>; just like the latter can be abused, so can the former. > The hyperlink is just an extra bonus; the real point is to have more > precise markup. If you think the hyperlink will encourage dependence > on it, I'm fine with <port> being another name for <filename>. I think you should commit it just as you originally described, with hyperlinks. My original message came out sounding more negative than I had intended. My concern about the way that hyperlinks are abused in the Handbook is really a separate issue. - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010719235055.A42999>