Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:50:26 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Eugene Polovnikov <paranoid@brain-fag.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines Message-ID: <20010316105026.A12010@daemon.ninth-circle.org> In-Reply-To: <20010316112914.A50671@zssm.zp.ua>; from paranoid@brain-fag.org on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 11:29:15AM %2B0200 References: <20010316112914.A50671@zssm.zp.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20010316 10:43], Eugene Polovnikov (paranoid@brain-fag.org) wrote: >Please, review the following PR: >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25847 > >Same patch is in the attach. Just a question, the gif interface now part of the system does tunneling as well in as much the same way as nos-tun does. Does gif work for the multihomed case? [I'll otherwise when not getting any responses dig up the answer myself.] I ask this because it serves no purpose having an IPv4-only [as far as my knowledge goes] tunnel application, whilst we have a more flexible new solution present. Translated, does gif do what nos-tun can do and more? Yes? Let's rip out nos-tun and support the other well maintained solution. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai .oUo. asmodai@[wxs.nl|freebsd.org] Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA 7152 035C 1138 546A B867 Don't try to find the Answer where there ain't no Question here... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010316105026.A12010>