Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 07:50:34 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 189257] [NEW PORT] databases/percona56-xtradb-cluster Message-ID: <bug-189257-13-fvvJlEeN19@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-189257-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-189257-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189257 --- Comment #18 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Scott Larson from comment #17) > A good chunk of this port came from the originally posted .shar and I was > just making the necessary mods to get the current stable release to patch > and build correctly, and pass Poudriere's testport process. That's strange, I could sworn I heard "original phar is already staged and works fine in poudriere." :) > As I can't > recall ever personally seeing xinetd in use on my FBSD servers over the > past.. too many years, that line may just need to be dropped. The issue is the command is masked, meaning we have to remove the "@" symbol, that's all. > The plist as it is, is 99% makeplist. > With the maintainer assignment, that also came from the original .shar. > Making an ass out of you and me, with it not being previously mentioned as a > problem I assumed it was fine. I'll define it to be whatever makes people > happy. I see you have three choices: 1) Put yourself there 2) Daniel realizes that in fact his port needed more work and that you just did him a big favor, and agrees to be the maintainer. 3) You add flo in the CC and ask if he will maintain it. I think you'd have a 50/50% chance of success with that. It doesn't hurt to ask. Those options are listed in order of speed to get this PR to "patch-ready" status. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-189257-13-fvvJlEeN19>