Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Dec 1998 02:50:59 -0500 (EST)
From:      Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>
To:        Sheldon Hearn <axl@iafrica.com>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ports that don't honour local CFLAGS
Message-ID:  <Pine.HPP.3.96.981229024819.26760D-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>
In-Reply-To: <5285.914928441@axl.noc.iafrica.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Dec 1998, Sheldon Hearn wrote:

> However, I propose that commiters should refuse to commit submitted
> ports that don't honour local CFLAGS without good reason. Instead, they
> should send submitters e-mail saying "either fix your port to honour
> local CFLAGS or justify the current behaviour".

> Obviously, existing ports that are "broken" in this respect should be
> fixed through PR's submitted by people like me whom they annoy. This
> proposal will simply ensure that the number of such ports doesn't grow,
> which means that the problem is manageable and will eventually go away.

I've bounced or changed the last few ports that I've committed updates to 
or imported, because of this very reason. In my make.conf, my CFLAGS is
actually defined to "-O -pipe -DI_LIKE_BREAKING_PORTS", no joke.

By all means, send-pr(1) when you find a port being bad in regards to this
(I just fixed postgresql, recently, for this reason).


- bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org  -




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.HPP.3.96.981229024819.26760D-100000>