Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 10:39:21 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl> Cc: gallatin@cs.duke.edu, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ISP firmware compiled in as a default.... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912051038160.28920-100000@beppo.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912051030570.28920-100000@beppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >... > > Hm. The DEC-sanctioned cards (as far as SRM booting goes, so for > > system disks) only use 1040's if I'm not mistaken. So this might be the > > most practical short-term solution. How much would 1040-only f/w > > add to the installation kernel ? > > Actually, the latest 4100 f/w (at least the one I installed at NASA/Ames) > recognizes the 2100, but won't boot from it. Nyah, Nyah! PTI PCI-470 > and Anatres Qlogic 2100 clones have fcode in them and you can boot from > them on sparc! And that should have been 'Antares'. And, of course, BIOS booting works for these cards too (via WWN). *Groan*- don't tell me that this would be an argument for support ARC.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9912051038160.28920-100000>