Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:50:23 +0200
From:      Ollivier Robert <>
To:        Randell Jesup <>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Matt Dillon <>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs newfs.8 newfs.c
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <0000157003191707d1@[]>; from on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:40:19AM -0400
References:  <><><><><><><><00005ba2015f4b07d1@[]> <0000157003191707d1@[]>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
According to Randell Jesup:
> So, do we really have problems with 16k/4k/64?  If so, let's fix the
> problems.

I don't know really if we have problems with something other than a 8:1 ratio
but 4k is too big IMO and wastes too much space.

> Or should we reduce the defaults to 16k/2k?  If so, what about existing
> FS's with these values?  If values above that are broken, should we
> disable them in newfs, or at least print a warning?

I'm all for 16/2k regardless of the FS size.
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=-
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun  4 22:44:19 CEST 2000

To Unsubscribe: send mail to
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>