Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 14:53:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is latest portsnap snapshot corrupted? Message-ID: <1369691616249-5815588.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <51A3CCF1.2080706@cran.org.uk> References: <1369665048044-5815448.post@n5.nabble.com> <CAA96eVvU0bU7-RVZE9RviZOrd05qC8q0aRLsJJ7AT=Qk_s6ecQ@mail.gmail.com> <1369679542074-5815520.post@n5.nabble.com> <20130528001340.393804429748c30d19c02ce3@gmail.com> <51A3CCF1.2080706@cran.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Indeed snapshot looks fixed, thanks for all replies! I don't use INDEX.db so should be fine without portsdb... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Is-latest-portsnap-snapshot-corrupted-tp5815448p5815588.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1369691616249-5815588.post>