Date: 06 Dec 2001 12:08:17 -0800 From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Incorrect info on the project page Message-ID: <2o3d2ojemm.d2o@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20011206191727.A97158@eborcom.com> References: <20011201213730.A66823@eborcom.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10112012004480.52205-100000@andrsn.stanford.edu> <20011206191727.A97158@eborcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > Okay, so should I just update the link to andrsn.stanford.edu, or is > it worth removing this item from the Projects list if it's not > actively being worked on? IMHO, we should only list projects that are > moving forward, but as you've put quite a bit of work into this I want > to check you're happy with this before I change anything. The fact that a site is not being worked on doesn't mean people can't find something useful at the site. (I don't know about this one.) In my link lists, I often mark such things "moribund". (Say in parens, right after the link?) A separate "moribund" Project category might even be useful, though it might be better to just mark them "moribund" AND move them to the bottoms of their current categories. P.S. "The FreeBSD Programmer's Documentation Project" looks moribund too. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2o3d2ojemm.d2o>