Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:20:34 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days Message-ID: <20100409002034.464742c8@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20100408202308.GA61756@comcast.net> References: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20100408202308.GA61756@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/=hdbDvADSngBhP+hzcoqMVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700 Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> wrote: > On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > >Hi, > > > > > >As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands > >ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is > >6-7 April. > > > >The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared > >lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > > > >We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > >and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / > >fixing. > > > >Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and > >http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=3Dfailed_buildports&sort=3Dlast= _built > >to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even > >fixed. We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the > >problems. > > > > > >Thank you, > > > >With hat: portmgr@ >=20 >=20 > Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the > original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree > considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA? From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:31:33 +0300 Just a status update: PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed. Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems. >>>> still work to do I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow morning. >>> Gnome -exp done, there's a showstopper on amd64 that we weren't aware >>> of. about 40 fixesso far. An other -exp needed. >>>> KDE in progress. Packages status: - i386:=20 - 6 after png and curl - 7 after png and curl - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished >>>>finished - 9 pacakges are from middle March >>> from 9 Apr. - amd64: - 6 packages are post png and curl - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of resources). >>> in progress, with ports from yesterday - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib problem). >>>> nope, still old packages. In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome and KDE now it's a good moment. >>> So no clear ETA yet, a few days more. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/=hdbDvADSngBhP+hzcoqMVX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAku+SKIACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeUW1QCgqtqd56ahjKSm6NGIqWiDiQjy vdYAn28a/v3XPnb5PM6ZO2AbU8czXdxN =QXnh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/=hdbDvADSngBhP+hzcoqMVX--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100409002034.464742c8>