Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:03:16 -0600
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>, Harry_M_Leitzell@cmu.edu, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel 
Message-ID:  <4.2.0.58.19990917160133.0483e1c0@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <199909171939.NAA04615@harmony.village.org>
References:  <Your message of "Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:15:02 MDT." <4.2.0.58.19990916100439.048ebd70@localhost> <4.2.0.58.19990916100439.048ebd70@localhost> <Your message of "Wed, 15 Sep 1999 20:12:54 MDT." <4.2.0.58.19990915200910.048dba50@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:39 PM 9/17/99 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:

>The best solution would be to have the IP stack that could deal with
>the needs of dhcp.

Technically, DHCP really should be in its OWN stack (though it will be
sending commands to control and enable the IP stack). It ought to plug
in like IPX and Appletalk do. This would be a really nice, clean solution.

--Brett



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.19990917160133.0483e1c0>