Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:30:33 -0700 From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: "Artyom Mirgorodskiy" <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com>, "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623. Message-ID: <51702dc6.87ee440a.57aa.327e@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <3591293.X8VkCk8bg8@home.alkar.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On head? Adrian Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T On Apr 18, 2013 10:06 AM, Artyom Mirgorodskiy <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.= com> wrote:=20 I tried to check out revision 245031 (only sys/dev/ath) and got a working= WiFi. I'll try to find a broken revision. On Thursday 18 April 2013 11:37:17 John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? >=20 > Only that this means absolutely nothing? These are the values the BIO= S wrote=20 > into the registers which we use as hints about whether or not ACPI lie= s about=20 > which interrupts are used when APIC is disabled. The actually useful= message > shows the same interrupts used in both cases: >=20 > > HEAD: > >=20 > > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at de= vice 0.0 on pci10 > > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 > >=20 > > versus > >=20 > > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at de= vice 0.0 on pci10 > > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 >=20 >=20 --=20 Artyom Mirgorodskiy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51702dc6.87ee440a.57aa.327e>