Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:47:17 -0800 From: Nick Rogers <ncrogers@gmail.com> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: jfv@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em(4) + ALTQ broken Message-ID: <147432021002020947m40e92094o742aa854ca89bd09@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100202173746.GA5901@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <147432021001310037n1b67f01bx4b4e8781321cea8@mail.gmail.com> <20100131224033.GA1107@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <147432021002020930y3591c278h6b07a235d3184752@mail.gmail.com> <20100202173746.GA5901@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:30:52AM -0800, Nick Rogers wrote: > > > I guess the problem comes from multi-queue support. The drbr > > > interface is implemented with inline function so em(4)/igb(4) may > > > have to define ALTQ to the header. I have not tested the patch(no > > > time at this moment) but would you give it try? > > > > > > I tried the patch and it did not work. > > You rebuilt kernel, right? Rebuilding kernel module has no effect. > Yes I rebuilt the kernel itself and replaced the one on my test system.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?147432021002020947m40e92094o742aa854ca89bd09>