Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:02:44 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        rgrimes@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r326758 - in head/sys/i386: conf include
Message-ID:  <5A2F8D24.2060203@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <tkrat.e2d4b56576e83ef2@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201712111733.vBBHX2a0082236@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <5A2ED3E1.1060908@grosbein.net> <tkrat.e2d4b56576e83ef2@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12.12.2017 06:00, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 12 Dec, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 
>> Now I run FreeBSD 11/i386 as my home router with IPSEC and torrent
>> client, and I run several virtualized routers with IPSEC tunnels,
>> jabber and mail server, squid and ZFS for src/obj/ports compression
>> and they all easily crash unless kern.kstack_pages raised upto 4. Same
>> for some other my i386 installations having IPSEC tunnels.
> 
> IPSEC definitely used to wwith with kstack_pages=2 since I ran that way
> for a number of years.  I haven't used IPSEC since I upgraded from
> FreeBSD 8.x to 10.x a while back, so it could be broken now.

That's all about FreeBSD 11 code base that growed more "fat" comparing with 8.x times.
It is not "broken", it just needs more stack :-)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A2F8D24.2060203>