Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:42:56 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/touch touch.1 touch.c Message-ID: <20070410071256.GJ91694@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <86zm5gr9wl.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200704090219.l392Jc1f064727@repoman.freebsd.org> <864pnpdf8w.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070410010901.GD61460@wantadilla.lemis.com> <86zm5gr9wl.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Tu8ztk+XgTAiG9Id Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 10 April 2007 at 9:00:42 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> On Monday, 9 April 2007 at 12:16:47 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: >>> The latter part is incorrect and should be reverted. Furthermore, >>> usage() should be static. >> Can you give details? > > usage() should be the way it was before your commit, except that it > should be static. You mean declared as a static function? In a program of a single file? As I said before, >> Can you give details? Specifically, this doesn't match my recollection of "good practice". Where is this behaviour mandated? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --Tu8ztk+XgTAiG9Id Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGGzj4IubykFB6QiMRAi+zAJ98xLoMwjfY3URKa8eBwrGUade7MwCcDi5J k8zVcKTxpg9rFwe5Z/ROGmw= =PQqg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Tu8ztk+XgTAiG9Id--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070410071256.GJ91694>