Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 21:47:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Zoltan HERPAI <wigyori@2p.hu> To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Cc: kat-free@kaqelectronics.dyndns.org Subject: Re: Big Problem Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408042137440.1024@fehercapa.kektintahal.pirospolip.hu> In-Reply-To: <20040804164954.GB10063@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <4110C9C7.6080506@kaqelectronics.dyndns.org> <20040804164954.GB10063@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 07:34:31PM +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > > Design a computer (probably multiple AMD 64's) to handle 10TB of memory > > (+ a few extra Gb of ram for system overhead) and hold the file in one > > physical computer system. > You would do well to read up on the techniques used by google to manage > unreliable systems and provide high-performance search. what about the tandem non-stop systems? it'll cost a pile of bucks.. but, i'm still unsure why a large cluster of oracle, or any specially designed rdbms wouldn't do the job. -w-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.58.0408042137440.1024>