Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Cc:        Chris Ruiz <yr.retarded@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why is intr taking up so much cpu?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007191953280.1694@qbhto.arg>
In-Reply-To: <201007200450.13885.max@love2party.net>
References:  <A81B337F-5932-44B1-BDB4-D9DD36332A16@lavabit.com> <AANLkTimwRV5jSP6z4_Z51RapkVgfTSHVQrVHONWKjA9B@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007191931040.1694@qbhto.arg> <201007200450.13885.max@love2party.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Max Laier wrote:

> Just a stab in the dark, did you "kldload dtraceall"?  KDTRACE_HOOKS just adds
> the needed linkage for the dtrace modules to work.

No, I had not done that, in fact, I didn't even know I needed those 
modules. I use MODULES_OVERRIDE so I had to add dtrace, cyclic, and 
opensolaris to the list.

In any case ... It's working now! :)

I'm collecting some data for "normal" atm, then I'll try to get it into 
the situation where intr runs away, and I'll do the same thing again.


Thanks Max and Chris,

Doug

-- 

 	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
 	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/

 	Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
 			-- Pablo Picasso




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1007191953280.1694>