Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:50:29 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: dmmiller@cvzoom.net Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More "ld-elf.so.1: assert failed" messages Message-ID: <200002290350.TAA67717@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <38BB1E9C.CF44EC93@cvzoom.net> References: <38BA5751.2396AE87@cvzoom.net> <200002290104.RAA60914@vashon.polstra.com> <38BB1E9C.CF44EC93@cvzoom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <38BB1E9C.CF44EC93@cvzoom.net>, Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net> wrote: > Here's the backtrace from gdb: > > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x2805ce30 in kill () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #1 0x2805ca0d in abort () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #2 0x28053c6e in lockdflt_acquire () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #3 0x28053bc0 in _rtld_bind () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #4 0x28051205 in _rtld_bind_start () from /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #5 0x284ad3fc in SYSDEPS_StartThread () from > /usr/local/lib/libwine.so > #6 0x0 in ?? () Thanks! I grabbed the 20000227 snapshot of wine and looked at its sources too, and I know what's going on now. It's the dreaded rfork threads. :-( I'm going to think about this a little bit. It may well be hard to fix it in time to make Jordan feel good about letting it into 4.0. > Note: I didn't compile wine with -g. I'll do that if you want... Thanks, but it's not necessary at this point. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002290350.TAA67717>