Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:09:19 +0200
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   <sys/types.h> or not <sys/types.h>? [Was: cvs commit: src/include grp.h]
Message-ID:  <3C7A458F.427FFF8A@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200202251355.g1PDtmb35078@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020225140030.GD33818@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 05:55:48 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > sobomax     2002/02/25 05:55:48 PST
> >
> >   Modified files:
> >     include              grp.h
> >   Log:
> >   Backout rev.1.5 - it seems that it's posixly correct that the program
> >   needs to include <sys/types.h> before <grp.h>.
> 
> No, it breaks POSIX compatibility, please back it out.
> 
> <grp.h> is standalone per POSIX and programs WILL treat is as standalone
> for that reason.

Are you sure? I've just heard so many opinions about that and want to
get some clarity before backouting the backout to avoid backouting the
backouted backout later. :)

Please, could anyone confirm or reject assertion that POSIX doesn't
require <sys/types.h> before <gpr.h>?

-Maxim

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C7A458F.427FFF8A>