Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 08:02:08 -0500 From: "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads models and FreeBSD. (Next Step) Message-ID: <381EE0D0.874F6198@vigrid.com> References: <25676.941546688@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <381EDBCE.FD7FBA68@vigrid.com>, "Daniel M. Eischen" writes: > > >> >Disagree. I want lightweight processes to have their own quantum > >> >not limited (in total) to the parent process quantum. > >> > >> That would clearly kill the "lightweight" in "lightweight process"... > > > >That doesn't mean they each have to have the same quantum as a non-MT > >process. > > That has nothing to do with it. > > There is not much point in making a lightweight process facility > if the resulting processes are not lightweight. And quantum is _the_ attribute that makes them lightweight or non lightweight? They each share file descriptors, address space, etc. Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?381EE0D0.874F6198>