Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:46:32 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: rwatson@FreeBSD.org Cc: ed@80386.nl, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, des@des.no, rafan@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r194628 - head/lib/ncurses/ncurses Message-ID: <20090630.094632.195416436.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906301631470.28381@fledge.watson.org> References: <86prcl23k8.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20090630.085955.63054488.imp@bsdimp.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906301631470.28381@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906301631470.28381@fledge.watson.org>
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > Last time this BBQ came up, I thought it was agreed that there would be a
: > xterm-XXX that didn't do this behavior for those folks that think the
: > current behavior is harmfully wrong...
:
: Whereas I think it's a bug in more(1)/less(1) that it tries to use those
: sequences...
Agreed. vi too. I'll note that on Mac OS, in the xterm, you don't
see this with either... But I don't know how to undo tic(1)
formatting to get back to the raw xterm entries...
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090630.094632.195416436.imp>