Date: 11 May 1999 12:15:07 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@visi.com>, "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SPAM Message-ID: <xzpogjrlxp0.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Chuck Robey's message of "Mon, 10 May 1999 17:10:38 -0400 (EDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905101708530.401-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> writes: > Garrett's points are why I sugggested that it would not be a useable > approach for -questions, newbies, and mabye hackers, 'cause they all get > a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and > committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn't hold > for those lists, which do get spammed. Oh no? I regularly send mail to -current and -committers from at least three different addresses, none of which are subscribed. Listen up. We've been through this before. We all agreed it wouldn't work. If you wanna know why, search the archives instead of making the problem considerably worse by starting (and fueling) threads such as this. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpogjrlxp0.fsf>