Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:59:43 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 ignored? Message-ID: <20201204225943.GA9439@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <blf9-42je-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <20201204203507.GA8573@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <blf9-42je-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:41:41PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes: > > > It takes a long time to compile on my laptop. I have > > > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 > > Why do you need to redefine current default? Simply changed /etc/make.conf on my laptop from 80 to 90 when I got a similar problem trying to rebuild gnuplot. Getting llvm10 when LLVM_DEFAULT=80 or 90 seems dubious. > Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: > LLVM_DEFAULT?= 90 > > > % portmaster -Byd gnuplot > > ... > > Install devel/llvm10 > > ... > > Install devel/llvm90 > > devel/llvm10 is pinned by graphics/mesa-* likely to reduce QA after a > fiasco in bug 239682. Trying to unpin in bug 250869 was rejected. > > graphics/mesa-dri/Makefile.common: > LLVM_DEFAULT= 10 Well, I guess that pretty much kills LLVM_DEFAULT for any modern hardware (even a 8 year old laptop) that uses drm unless a user wants base-system llvm, llvm90, and llvm10 installed. One will certainly be able to compile any c/c++ thrown ones way. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20201204225943.GA9439>