Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:14:17 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> To: George Liaskos <geo.liaskos@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>, chromium@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92 Message-ID: <4E9D7BA9.2070901@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <CANcjpOBTYexh5f5fACGJjWHU6RojBwMOW_yPJMA85CLeY-an-Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANcjpOD9PsunPiqG1yRaENtOqVdBhuOV_Fj3GB0zAP=jNCXtLw@mail.gmail.com> <CANcjpOAoA4c-jAbdBWLnSZuDAkBjPhyntOOuZrBJbm4iemYOwA@mail.gmail.com> <20111018114830.GA25714@freebsd.org> <CANcjpOBTYexh5f5fACGJjWHU6RojBwMOW_yPJMA85CLeY-an-Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
George Liaskos wrote on 18.10.2011 16:16: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Alexander Best<arundel@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Sun Oct 16 11, George Liaskos wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos<geo.liaskos@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz >>>> http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz >>>> >>> >>> Meh, sorry about that. I pushed send by mistake. >>> >>> What i meant to write was : please test Chromium 15.0.874.92 :) >>> >>> There are many people that report problems with the current version of >>> Chromium in ports. >>> I believe that this revision of the port should resolve most of the >>> issues but it would be really nice if we have more feadback. >>> >>> The package is for 9 amd64 compiled with gcc45. >> >> i'm experiencing issues with the port. i'm building it myself via base gcc >> and chromium crashed with signal 10. i checked the core dump and the cause was >> libtcmalloc.so.2 from the google-perftools port. so i rebuilt the port, but for >> some reason the port doesn't install libtcmalloc.so.2. trying to rebuild >> chromium, it sees that that file is missing and asumes a missing dependency and >> tries installing the google-perftools port. that however fails, because the >> port already is installed. >> >> the following files should be installed by the port, but they don't: >> >> cd /usr/ports/devel/google-perftools ; make clean; make; make install; make deinstall >> >> [..] >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libprofiler.so' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libprofiler.so.1' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc.so' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc.so.2' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc_and_profiler.so' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc_and_profiler.so.2' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc_debug.so' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc_debug.so.2' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc_minimal.so' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc_minimal.so.2' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc_minimal_debug.so' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libtcmalloc_minimal_debug.so.2' doesn't exist >> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package `google-perftools-1.8.3 >> >> cheers. >> alex >> > > Unfortunately i don't have a 10 jail / testing environment yet, i will > setup one later today and i will get back to you. >> From what i understand Ruslan Mahmatkhanov uses CURRENT without problems though. Yes, all is fine here. And i didn't used libtool-fixed and UNAME_r hack for building. Using stock gcc and default options (CODECS,GCONF). > > Thanks for testing. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E9D7BA9.2070901>