Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:24:49 +1030
From:      "Martin Minkus" <diskiller@diskiller.net>
To:        <freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: OpenBoot (was Re: Anyone out there ?)
Message-ID:  <005001c043e1$669b4bd0$0200000a@lan.diskiller.net>
References:  <016a01c03d9d$eb2c6950$0200000a@lan.diskiller.net> <39F5BD2D.2F978990@post.rwth-aachen.de> <009801c04336$7e45ea20$0200000a@lan.diskiller.net> <39FF5BA1.13A26A16@post.rwth-aachen.de> <002c01c043d7$eab6c4d0$0200000a@lan.diskiller.net> <20001101000835.H5844@dragon.nuxi.com> <004401c043de$c2ddf260$0200000a@lan.diskiller.net> <20001101004422.I5844@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 07:05:55PM +1030, Martin Minkus wrote:
> >
> > Which source tree do i cvsup ? Only alpha and i386 is in the src-sys
> > distrubution. Then again, i'm only following 4.x-stable, not -current.
>
> Doing any porting work using 4-stable is a waste of time.  New platform
> support can only go into -current.  Which is where the OpenBoot bits will
> land.

Well naturally that makes sense.

However i don't really expect the FreeBSD/sparc32 port to become an official
port. (So its not particularly important which codebase i use; a previous
post was recommending i use FreeBSD 2.2.7).

Also as i stated in a previous post, this is mostly a learning exercise so i
can work on the /sparc64 port if i ever get an Ultra. :). All i have is a
Sparc10 atm, and i have to make do with this for now.

Sparc64 is alot more complicated, with 32bit and 64bit kernels, and 32bit
and 64bit userspace, or mixes between the two.

martin.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005001c043e1$669b4bd0$0200000a>