Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:16:02 -0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: GENERIC kernel issues
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmokWKcogM%2BJFWn%2B%2Brw6kn85xw-5wGeiV2yiS9upidXBvSA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130307005649.35a6b9ae.ray@freebsd.org>
References:  <DF7B73D4-BE50-4E75-8D5B-FE19A4764F31@freebsd.org> <1362445777.1195.299.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <3DFABC9A-876A-4F34-9E15-E4C630D7B077@bsdimp.com> <1362542286.1291.94.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <4CF23AFE-DD69-40AA-ACFB-46F055F0AA3F@bsdimp.com> <1362594744.1291.132.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <DDB2A45D-33E4-4612-A17B-62F57EBCDFD0@bsdimp.com> <20130306234004.bf113967.ray@freebsd.org> <4C0099FA-BBBE-4F93-8C97-CE5B79465829@bsdimp.com> <20130307005649.35a6b9ae.ray@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peeps,

If you make the boot process too complicated and it stops being "load
kernel via flash/NFS, boot" then people may just not bother. :-)

I know you're going for correctness and we're hampered by how "linux
does things', but I really do suggest that you first get working,
packaged, easily installed and updated systems using what we currently
heave before you try to make a 'much nicer but noone ever uses it'
solution.

Please don't fall down the trap of "over-engineering correctness that
noone will ever use." that software people do when they don't have
deliverables.

2c,



Adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokWKcogM%2BJFWn%2B%2Brw6kn85xw-5wGeiV2yiS9upidXBvSA>