Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:56:57 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux kernel compatability Message-ID: <4D254B99.1010501@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <4D254909.5040604@freebsd.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101031017110.1450@desktop> <20110103220153.69cf59e0@kan.dnsalias.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101031859290.1450@desktop> <20110104082252.45bb5e7f@kan.dnsalias.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101041030120.1450@desktop> <20110105124045.6a0ddd1a@kan.dnsalias.net> <20110105175926.GA2101@vniz.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101051413070.1450@desktop> <D3E4F3D4-55FD-48B5-B175-CF152B9B3AE4@samsco.org> <20110106024403.GB22349@vniz.net> <8A69DE05-A433-4D40-8E63-8F06215606F2@samsco.org> <4D254909.5040604@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Vendor vs User, two sides. Here, if one is native, another > is emulation, people would run native version rather than emulation. > > Hmm. Large chunks of code is run in the windows world in 'emulation' mode. I don't think people really care as long as it doesn't mess up and annoy them.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D254B99.1010501>