Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 17:53:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209661] amd64_set_ioperm overflow Message-ID: <bug-209661-8-6FJx2dQ8k9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-209661-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-209661-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209661 --- Comment #2 from CTurt <cturt@hardenedbsd.org> --- Sorry, I made a mistake in my report; the bound check is incorrect, as described, however, no negative array index will occur from this since an unsigned comparison is used in the loop. The impact is simply that `0` will= be returned instead of `EINVAL`. This patch is good because unsigned is more appropriate for `i`, however it doesn't fix the bug. An additional patch should be applied to validate user arguments more effectively than the current bound check, so that the arguments I posted originally will no longer be accepted. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-209661-8-6FJx2dQ8k9>