Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:11:29 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, ru@FreeBSD.org, cjc@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_pcb.c Message-ID: <20030221171129.GB7233@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030221165712.GJ68768@survey.codeburst.net> References: <20030221151709.GH68768@survey.codeburst.net> <200302211530.h1LFUiPE034532@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20030221165712.GJ68768@survey.codeburst.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:57:12PM +0000, Paul Richards wrote: > I was only suggesting that there > should perhaps be a class of changes that are marked as "experimental" > so people aren't surprised if that feature gets removed at a later > date. If it turns out in 6-12 months time that a lot of people are > getting caught out by this change then we might want to revert it, and > marking it as an experimental feature makes people think more carefully > about what they're doing. OK, that's reasonable. Why don't you work out the documentation details. However, IMHO, it would not be appropriate to classify the ``change''/``feature'' under question as ``experimental'' in any case. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030221171129.GB7233>