Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:49:57 -0200 From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" <matheus@eternamente.info> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/140883: [axe] [usb8] USB gigabit ethernet hangs after short period of traffic Message-ID: <e2d2643cb3f41ecaacec532c63624c2a.squirrel@eternamente.info> In-Reply-To: <20101119212333.GD13317@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <20101118202426.GB8512@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <bab43754fb4c3361ef0d990af3c3bd07.squirrel@eternamente.info> <20101119000618.GC8512@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <32aed4c0a483f26c662dd513ea718a78.squirrel@eternamente.info> <20101119013857.GE8512@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <8ca59ffdfef13423f8a34d81cfdefc49.squirrel@eternamente.info> <20101119171324.GA13317@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <603efbe44ab6deefcd86905280566f32.squirrel@eternamente.info> <20101119192731.GB13317@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <9ecdf40489022c754096ac1f388a605f.squirrel@eternamente.info> <20101119212333.GD13317@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, November 19, 2010 19:23, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:23:50PM -0200, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > [...] > >> > Ok, try again after downloading new if_axe.c and let me know >> > the output "EEPROM data : 0xXX, phymode : 0xXX" shown on your >> > console. >> >> never got to see that message. I saw the diff to previous version, and >> did >> boot into verbose mode (dmesg attached). there were just the belkin >> gigabit nic on boot. after, the linksys USB200M: >> >> axe1: <vendor 0x13b1 product 0x0018, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 3> on usbus2 >> axe1: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x10 >> miibus2: <MII bus> on axe1 >> ukphy1: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> PHY 16 on miibus2 >> ukphy1: OUI 0x000ec6, model 0x0001, rev. 1 >> ukphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto >> ue1: <USB Ethernet> on axe1 >> ue1: bpf attached >> invalid media SR 0x700 >> invalid media SR 0x700 >> > > This is normal, the message I said will show up when you use > gigabit controller, AX88178. This controller is fast ethernet > controller, AX88772A. yes, I just tried to show that message with other nic. >> >> and the other gigabit: >> >> ugen2.4: <vendor 0x050d> at usbus2 >> axe2: <vendor 0x050d product 0x5055, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 4> on usbus2 >> axe2: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x01 >> miibus3: <MII bus> on axe2 >> truephy1: <ET1011 10/100/1000baseT PHY> PHY 1 on miibus3 >> truephy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, >> 1000baseT-FDX, >> auto >> ue2: <USB Ethernet> on axe2 >> ue2: bpf attached >> ue2: Ethernet address: my mac here >> ue2: link state changed to DOWN >> >> and never got to see the EEPROM message. >> > > Two odd things here. This controller looks like Belkin F5D5055 and yes, it's this one. > it is gigabit controller. So it should print the message I > mentioned in previous mail. Are you sure you rebuild/reboot your > kernel? as usual, just rebuilt the axe module ... so I'm going to rebuild now. this is a slow box, and might take a couple of hours. Will try to do it also in a notebook running stable to speedup the process. > The second odd thing is now truephy(4) PHY driver is attached to > your controller. Previously it was ukphy(4) generic PHY driver. > This means accessing GMII is not reliable such that reading OUI of > PHY changed its value. Maybe this could the reason why you see lots > of link UP/DOWN messages since mii(4) periodically polls a register > through GMII. If the register value read through GMII constantly > changes it will cause all sorts of problems. > I'm not sure whether this is axe(4) issue or USB stack issue. I > also have Belkin F5D5055 controller and has no such problems so I > guess it could be related with other parts of USB stack. > > To easily identify issues for a controller, it would be better to > remove all other axe(4) controllers except one you want to test. ok, I was also testing that other issue. Will separate things from now on. no problem using stable from October 7, right ? thanks, matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e2d2643cb3f41ecaacec532c63624c2a.squirrel>