Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:11:22 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] shipping kernels with default modules? Message-ID: <FE2990C0-1AB0-462F-9A74-8FAF826F33A3@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <118F0BE0-2F1A-4106-8050-F6FE1321E106@bsdimp.com> References: <BANLkTin2AwKRT7N6HWqBctJcT72_mR=Otg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinJP%2BmSiacOO03r8zAY_79ABDy_EQ@mail.gmail.com> <BDC0C06C-3152-49AF-A0F7-86A05AF14288@bsdimp.com> <B2BF0A26-1819-49C2-8331-3F00712AF523@lists.zabbadoz.net> <118F0BE0-2F1A-4106-8050-F6FE1321E106@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 12, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> Generally, the modules follow the global settings, since we've never =
tested building some network drivers with INET and some without, for =
example.
>>=20
>> What do you mean? I have been doing that for 2 or is it 3 years; you =
can even see which ones depend on it in sys/conf/makeLINT.mk these days =
;)
>=20
> Sorry, I mean we do generally build ALL of them without INET or ALL of =
them with INET. While some people sometimes do things like load em with =
INET and say cxgb without INET in the same system, in general this =
hasn't been widely tested.
Oh, I see. I'd say "if at all unless by accident" in that case;)
--=20
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FE2990C0-1AB0-462F-9A74-8FAF826F33A3>