Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:39:21 -0700
From:      Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Karim <fodillemlinkarim@gmail.com>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ipfw rule processing performances
Message-ID:  <CAHu1Y705Ds7d06c0Qm_BM_x%2BmGGgZB41P=p2Xg33a5qQvpiyJg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EA853D7.4010305@freebsd.org>
References:  <4EA6D78F.6010607@gmail.com> <4EA73BAB.70607@freebsd.org> <CAHu1Y71Lf8=x3=S8cf__aT2fxyv6eX_EBqZvybgzwi9Q%2BSfzRQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EA85168.5020103@gmail.com> <4EA853D7.4010305@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> read up on all the things you can do with tablearg.. sometimes a single
> table can replace dozens of rules.

Julian - would you be so kind as to give an example?

- M



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y705Ds7d06c0Qm_BM_x%2BmGGgZB41P=p2Xg33a5qQvpiyJg>