Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:15:29 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Joshua Lee <yid@softhome.net> Cc: root@utility.clubscholarship.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inuring FreeBSD to the apache bug without upgrading apache ? Message-ID: <3D15BBE1.83E4DCF7@mindspring.com> References: <20020620141424.U68572-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com> <3D129688.356A87D0@mindspring.com> <20020623003014.1575c491.yid@softhome.net> <3D158F8C.8AA61132@mindspring.com> <20020623062830.6137cdfc.yid@softhome.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joshua Lee wrote: [ ... "mod_blowchunks" ... ] > > But if a client uses chunking legitimately, and does so becuase > > it believes it's talking to an HTTP server, you've just broken > > that client's ability to POST/PUT. > > You mean to say "it believes it is talking to an HTTP 1.1 server", yes? Yes. > I guess using HTTP 1.0 is a better solution then. Of course, maybe the > *best* solution IMVHO would be to upgrade to the Apache version without > this bug. Yeah; this whole thread is premised on working around the problem without an Apache software change. It's a reasonable premise (IMO) -- if you've got a custom compilation and a lot of modules, that can end up being a lot of software. I build a PHP4+SSL+Apache+IMAP+etc. source tree at one point, and it ended up being ~1.2 million lines of code, all told, that had to be made to work together. If you had "just built it", then it would be very hard to update just one component without repeating the whole process. My advice? Use CVS. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D15BBE1.83E4DCF7>