Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 01:15:19 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Cc: proff@suburbia.net Subject: Re: w problem Message-ID: <Mutt.19970108011519.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <19970107220300.5821.qmail@suburbia.net>; from proff@suburbia.net on Jan 8, 1997 09:03:00 %2B1100 References: <m0vhhQc-000FzfC@rabbit.augusta.de> <19970107220300.5821.qmail@suburbia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As proff@suburbia.net wrote: > Was this utmp change entirely necessary? Yes. It was long overdue. > From now on, xf86 has to produce two > versions of its binary distribution, pre and post utmp mangle. No. There are other possible fixes, they have been discussed, and they will eventually be implemented before FreeBSD 3.0 is released. (Concentrating all the handling in libutil, basically.) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970108011519.j>