Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:43:55 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r239353 - head/sys/netinet Message-ID: <201208200743.55498.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <E60B43B7-21D3-421E-B631-8F0A99ACDF07@lakerest.net> References: <201208170551.q7H5pkd1025308@svn.freebsd.org> <201208170826.25123.jhb@freebsd.org> <E60B43B7-21D3-421E-B631-8F0A99ACDF07@lakerest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:31:24 am Randall Stewart wrote: > Note that in the main FreeBSD sources however, the fact that ip_input.c d= oes *not* lock > when it looks at the hash table these lines are removing from here means = there is still a potential > for a crash. I have a fix for this that does not require the lock, when I= get a moment > I will send it your way=85 you have seen part of it ;-) Heh, that is probably true, I just think that moving the ifa_free() around here doesn't help to solve those crashes. You are just as vulnerable no matter where they are performed. =2D-=20 John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201208200743.55498.jhb>