Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:45:59 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: bzeeb+freebsd+lor@zabbadoz.net, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LOR: USB config SX lock vs. USB suspend and resume SX lock Message-ID: <201011142145.59397.bruce@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <201011142228.02765.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <201011142119.46709.bruce@cran.org.uk> <201011142228.02765.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 14 November 2010 21:28:02 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Can you verify that this LOR is real, and that it is not due to SX-locks > having similar names? I'm not sure how to do that, but "show alllocks" in ddb returns: Process 14 (usb) thread 0xffffff0005402450 (100051) exclusive sleep mutex Giant (Giant) r = 0 (0xffffffff80835d40 locked @ /usr/src/head/sys/dev/usb/usb_transfer.c:3121 exclusive sx USB suspend and resume SX lock (USB suspend and resume SX lock) r = 0 (0xffffff00057c2090) locked @ /usr/src/head/sys/dev/usb/usb_device.c:2672 exclusive sx USB config SX lock (USB config SX lock) r = 0 (0xffffff00057c2070) locked @ /usr/src/head/sys/dev/usb/usb_device.c:2671 -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011142145.59397.bruce>