Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 12:15:15 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Steve Polyack <korvus@comcast.net> Cc: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS (zpool) doesn't detect failed drive Message-ID: <41F1859A-4C53-4D39-8B53-B2994954D772@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4BE188D8.3090301@comcast.net> References: <4BE16784.8050400@omnilan.de> <4BE18729.3050209@omnilan.de> <4BE188D8.3090301@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/05/2010, at 12:33, Steve Polyack wrote: > It may not be something you can try on a production system, but if you = can experiment, it's worth a shot. Note that your device names WILL = change to adaX instead of adX. I would definitely recommend you = glabel(8) and create the zpool/zdevs using the glabel devices instead to = circumvent any future problems associated with device numbering. If you partitioned them with GPT then you can use GPT IDs :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41F1859A-4C53-4D39-8B53-B2994954D772>