Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:00:17 +0000 From: Shamim Shahriar <shamim.shahriar@gmail.com> To: David Mehler <dave.mehler@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pf, nat, and asterisk in jail Message-ID: <CAOyJeZQecJdhOEsMBFAWAKc6N7SpQuQ0pmcCDzBoMGpx0Au9xg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPORhP5Uv%2BCFuUVsrvtXpmcyJoPX=PQ5Dnb3pFnTCdfNmio3iQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPORhP5Uv%2BCFuUVsrvtXpmcyJoPX=PQ5Dnb3pFnTCdfNmio3iQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Dave, not sure how exactly you have your jail's in terms of of and the rest of the network, so cannot give you any definite information. But I have asterisk box with of where I had to open a range of ports for RTP to work. If your jail is on the same subnet, you can try that (if your jail m had its own of, don't forget to open then from the host pf). If your jail is begging a NAT, I think you will benefit from 1:1 may and then opening the range for the host. Hope this helps. Best regards On 22 Mar 2017 4:25 am, "David Mehler" <dave.mehler@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I've asked this on freebsd-pf so far no response so thought i'd try here. > > Is anyone using pf with asterisk in a jail? If so how did you get rtp > going? The sip is going through fine, I'm using 10.3, and my pf policy > is default deny. Under that circumstance rtp is not going, I know this > because of the fact that changing the block all to pass all and it all > works. > > Thanks. > Dave. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOyJeZQecJdhOEsMBFAWAKc6N7SpQuQ0pmcCDzBoMGpx0Au9xg>