Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 21:58:37 -0400 From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inet_aton() Bug or feature? Message-ID: <20021004015837.GA71793@ussenterprise.ufp.org> In-Reply-To: <1033696158.61118.13.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> References: <1136947159.20021003160026@yahoo.com> <20021003195515.GA92263@blossom.cjclark.org> <20021004013814.GA70364@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <1033696158.61118.13.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In a message written on Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 11:19:16AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I would imagine this behaviour is like it is because that is how atoi
> and friends work..
Absolutely. I think this is the unintended consequence sort of
bug, not the programmer goofed sort of bug. :) I'd definately
call the poster's original problem a bug though, IMHO.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021004015837.GA71793>