Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:04:20 +0200 From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Luiz Otavio O Souza <luiz@netgate.com>, Julien LUSIAK <julien.lusiak@stormshield.eu>, Fabien Thomas <fabien.thomas@stormshield.eu> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Marvell Armada 38x support in the tree Message-ID: <CAPv3WKd-p0pWqT_9UD1RH3nKv1BXJBFxqpbzoFQtMS2RmhykQg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170615141807.6ad67d689bc9b7c4bc744ea2@bidouilliste.com> References: <CAPv3WKdzoTxVFShuqjpm9tRbZOSTJjUpPMzgm3zTLJPourUtmg@mail.gmail.com> <20170615141807.6ad67d689bc9b7c4bc744ea2@bidouilliste.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Emmanuel, > > First thank you for working on it. > > What's the status with the DTS ? Do we still need the ones in > sys/boot/fdt or can we use the ones in sys/gnu/dts ? > We cannot use 1:1 linux device trees (ours are based on v4.10, there was almost no work done after that), although we are very close to it. There are differences in PCIe ranges and also /soc - /soc/interregs simple-bus nodes ranges. Both would require big workarounds in generic code. On the other hand board dts files are basically the same in both OSs. Marcin > I'm gonna clean the sys/boot/fdt soon after importing latest dts from > linux (I'm waiting for 4.12 to be out).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPv3WKd-p0pWqT_9UD1RH3nKv1BXJBFxqpbzoFQtMS2RmhykQg>