Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 23:09:48 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RiscBSD speed Message-ID: <19970618230948.EJ13870@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970618115528.11180A-100000@misery.sdf.com>; from Tom Samplonius on Jun 18, 1997 11:59:11 -0700 References: <9706181755.AA16829@fyeung8.netific.com> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970618115528.11180A-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Tom Samplonius wrote: > This was hardly relevant to the freebsd-hackers list. I normally hate off-topic postings, but i found it at least interesting (assuming also the usual grain of salt you gotta take for a microbenchmark like lmbench). > FreeBSD doesn't > run on most of those platforms. Plus, the benchmarks were run on FreeBSD > 2.1, but which 2.1? 2.1.0, 2.1.5, 2.1.6, 2.1.7? The picture mentioned 2.1-S, presumably meaning 2.1-stable. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970618230948.EJ13870>