Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:30 +0000
From:      RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ?
Message-ID:  <20120228152030.1d702439@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F4CDC18.8060905@my.gd>
References:  <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> <4F4CDC18.8060905@my.gd>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:52:24 +0100
Damien Fleuriot wrote:

> On 2/28/12 2:14 PM, Stas Verberkt wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:21:35PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >> I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the
> >> even branches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the
> >> machine here runs 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will
> >> arrive at the scene.
> >>
> > Just wondering: is there any difference between an even and an
> > uneven branch?
> > 
> > Kind regards,
> > 
> > Stas Verberkt
> > 
> 
> To be honest, there shouldn't be.
> 
> There's an old saying that goes along the lines of "uneven are
> unstable/experimental" but recent comments on the ML have claimed
> otherwise.

That's a Linux thing surely. I've never seen it claimed for FreeBSD.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120228152030.1d702439>