Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:56:26 -0600
From:      "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
To:        Danial Thom <danial_thom@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, ann kok <annkok2001@yahoo.com>
Subject:   Re: freebsd router
Message-ID:  <20060111135626.GG98918@over-yonder.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060111134814.19609.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References:  <20060111133229.GF98918@over-yonder.net> <20060111134814.19609.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:48:14AM -0800 I heard the voice of
Danial Thom, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> I'd be interested in hearing your reasoning for thinking so.

I can walk over to Cisco and buy a router that will push well over a
billion packets per second.  FreeBSD 4.x can't even come within 3
orders of magnitude of that.


> Routing is fastest when implemented as a single process task.

Not even remotely true.  And routing is CERTAINLY not fastest when
implemented on a CPU.


> While it could be possible to have a faster routing subsystem on a
> custom-designed MP O/S, its not practical to build a general purpose
> O/S in such a way.

s/could be/absolutely is/
Which pretty well eliminates the statement "FreeBSD foo is the fastest
router platform Man has ever created" right there.  The fastest router
platform is and will always be a platform designed to be a router.


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060111135626.GG98918>