Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Mar 1999 14:59:22 -0800
From:      "Michael Bryan" <fbsd-security@ursine.com>
To:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: xinetd vs. tcp_wrappers
Message-ID:  <199903261459220480.423A1371@quaggy.ursine.com>
In-Reply-To: <199903261618.EAA16015@aniwa.sky>
References:  <199903261618.EAA16015@aniwa.sky>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 3/27/99 at 4:18 AM Andrew McNaughton wrote:
>marker@trolldom.oss.uswest.net said:
>> I have, however, been unable to get xinetd to
>> 
>> 	1) send me mail when someone touches my machines in a
>> 	   way i've not said is ok,
>
>Supposing someone is sniffing your network, and you are
>reading your mail from another machine, does this mail
>give away any otherwise unknown information about the
>configuration of the machine?

Why would you be doing an admin task over the network in
the clear in the first place?  My personal opinion is that
every admin task should either be done on the console, or
via a secure/encrypted communication channel, if at all
possible.

Michael Bryan
fbsd-security@ursine.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903261459220480.423A1371>