Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 23:14:47 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ia_netbroadcast Message-ID: <20040520221447.GG86489@empiric.dek.spc.org> In-Reply-To: <40AD1B39.AAF75D9D@freebsd.org> References: <20040518092439.GF845@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040518024346.A5068@xorpc.icir.org> <20040518100503.GG845@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040518034756.A9648@xorpc.icir.org> <20040520152127.GP845@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <40AD1B39.AAF75D9D@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:55:21PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > However I'm not yet sure we (better I) understand all implications of > removing the things you do in your patch. Please hold off for a moment > until I've finished thinking and looking through the implications. I say can it. It appears to have outlived what little usefulness it might once have had. This is just based on a quick look over what it does in TCP/IP Illustrated Vol 2 and a look at where it's actually referenced within the kernel. If userland needs to see it, it can easily be served up on demand. Regards, BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040520221447.GG86489>