Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:43:21 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@comcast.net> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPNAT & IPv6 Message-ID: <20050105064321.GA25659@goku.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <20050104203748.GA30806@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <49ba28080412310759c27cfc0@mail.gmail.com> <200501030825.j038PBMF031009@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <49ba280805010301406eba0009@mail.gmail.com> <20050105.052819.02290257.yamamoto436@oki.com> <20050104203748.GA30806@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:37:48PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:28:19AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote: > > > > As far as I have tested pf(packet filter) on FreeBSD 5.3R, > > NAT function with IPv6 does not work well. Log says conversion is > > done. But source address is not translated. Though I asked > > about it in freebsd-pf mailing list, we have not had any reponses yet. > > I don't think any of our packet filters really support IPv6 NAT at this > point. In IPv6, it is spelled "NAP." See, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vandevelde-v6ops-nap-00.txt NAT is eevul. Can we please, pretty please leave it with IPv4? -- Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050105064321.GA25659>