Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:13:08 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen <listreader@lazlarlyricon.com> To: Leslie Jensen <leslie@eskk.nu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [NOT SOLVED]Re: Loading kernel modules for virtualbox via script Message-ID: <4B2FD6D4.7060509@lazlarlyricon.com> In-Reply-To: <4B2FB0DA.7030107@eskk.nu> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912202157330.32571@fledge.watson.org> <4B2F60BA.7010002@bsdforen.de> <4B2F9CEF.6050501@eskk.nu> <4B2FA3DD.5050206@lazlarlyricon.com> <4B2FA6F0.30306@eskk.nu> <4B2FAA1D.9000701@lazlarlyricon.com> <4B2FAD42.1060009@eskk.nu> <4B2FB0DA.7030107@eskk.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Leslie Jensen wrote: > >> >> >> You where right! One of them loaded the other so problem solved :-) >> >> Thank you! > > You where right, but it's the wrong order!!!! > > They must be loaded in the reverse order. > > Sorry > > > This is purely empirical knowledge, and I can't back it up by documentation. If module A requires module B to function, but not to load, module B will be loaded after module A. Have you tried changing which module you specifically load (i.e. if you now have module A specified in loader.conf and module B is demand loaded, try removing module and specify module B instead) to see if it reverses the order? It probably won't, since that would imply circular dependencies, but I'd try it anyway, if for nothing else, just to rule the possibility out.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B2FD6D4.7060509>